# Differentiation - the product rule

Categories: differentiation calculus

The *product rule* allows us to find the derivative of the product of 2 or more functions. It provides a simple way to differentiate functions such as:

It is also known as the *Leibniz product rule*, or sometimes simply the *Leibniz rule*.

In this article we will give some worked examples of the rule, including applying it to the case of x squared to show that it gives the same result as differentiation from first principles. We will then look at an informal geometric interpretation of the formula, before working through a formal proof. Finally, we will see how to apply it to products of 3 or more formulas.

## The rule

If we have a function *f* that is the product of 2 functions *u* and *v*:

The derivative is given by:

This rule allows us to differentiate any function that is the product of 2 other functions that we already know how to differentiate. The rule can easily be extended to the product of 3 or more functions.

## Example

Let's see how this applies to the first example we saw earlier:

This formula is a product of two terms *u* and *v*:

We also need to know the first derivative of each of these functions. These are both standard results:

We can now calculate the derivative of *f* using the product rule we saw earlier:

Substituting the terms we calculated earlier gives the final result:

This simplifies to:

We will look at the another example later in the article.

## Verifying the formula for x squared

We can check that this method makes sense, informally, by applying it to a result we already know, *x* squared. The derivative of this, of course, is *2x*.

We can write *x* squared as a product, *x* times *x*:

This means that *u* and *v* are both equal to *x*:

The derivative of *x* is 1:

Substituting the values into the product rule formula gives:

Which simplifies to:

This is exactly what we expected, so we have verified that the product rule works for *x* squared.

## Geometric interpretation of the general case

If *f(x)* is the product of 2 functions *u(x)* and *v(x)*, we can represent the value of *f(x)* as the area of a rectangle with sides *u(x)* and *v(x)*. This is shown on the left here:

Now let's suppose we increment *x* by a small amount *Δx*. This caused *u* to change by a small amount *Δu* and *v* to change by a small amount *Δv*. That is shown on the right, above.

Incrementing *x* adds two orange rectangles to the area. The right-hand rectangle has area *Δu* by *v*, and the top rectangle has *u* by *Δv*.

There is also a tiny yellow rectangle size *Δu* by *Δv*. As *Δx* gets very small, this rectangle gets smaller much more quickly than the two orange rectangles, so we will ignore it in our calculations (we will justify this in the formal derivation later).

So the approximate change in *f* as we change *x* by *Δx* is given by:

Dividing through by *Δx* we find the approximate rate of change:

As *Δx* tends to 0 this resembles the product rule formula:

## Proof

The proof of the product rule isn't particularly difficult, it is quite similar to the geometric interpretation we have just looked at. But it has quite a few stages, so we will go through it one step at a time. We will be proving the result using the limit definition of the derivative:

First we replace *f* with *u* times *v*:

The next step isn't particularly obvious, but the reason for it will be clear in a little while. We are going to add this expression into the limit clause:

Since this expression has two identical terms, one positive and one negative, it is equal to 0. That means that if we add it to one side the equation will still be valid. Here is the equation with the extra expression added:

Now we will split the limit into two parts:

We will call these two parts *a* and *b*, and deal with them separately:

You can perhaps start to see why we added the strange expression earlier. It means that *a* has a factor of *v(x + h)* and *b* has a factor of *u(x)*. Here is what happens if we take the common factor out of the expression for *a*:

Now as *h* tends towards 0, the term *v(x + h)* tends towards *v(x)*. And since *v(x)* is independent of *h*, we can take it outside the limit:

Notice now that the limit term is equal to the definition of the first derivative of *u*. so we can write *a* as:

You might now be able to see where this proof is going. The expression for *b* has a common term in *u(x)* that we can extract, giving:

Again, *u(x)* doesn't depend on *h* so we can take it outside the limit:

Now the limit term is equal to the definition of the derivative of *v*, so we can write:

Finally, since *f' = a + b* we have:

This proves the product rule.

## Another example

Now we will apply this to another example:

This time *f* is the product of these two functions, *u* and *v*:

The derivatives of *u* and *v* are standard results:

If we plug these results into the product rule formula we get:

This can be simplified to:

The *sin* and *cos* terms can also be simplified (this is a standard result that we won't prove here):

## Applying the product rule to 3 (or more) functions

The product rule can be applied to the product of 3 functions:

In that case, the rule is:

To gain an intuitive understanding of this rule, we can consider a cuboid of sides *u(x)*, *v(x)* and *w(x)*, like this:

The volume of the cube represents *f(x)*, the product of the 3 functions. This is analogous to the rectangle we used in the 2-function case.

When we increased *x* by *Δx*, the 3 faces **A**, **B** and **C** move, changing the volume of the cuboid. Face **A** moves by an amount *Δu*, and since the area of the face is *v(x)* by *w(x)*, the change in volume is *Δu.v(x).w(x)*. Side **B** moves by an amount *Δv* and changes the volume by an amount *u(x).Δv.w(x)*. Side **C** changes the volume by an amount *u(x).v(x).Δw*.

As *Δx* tends to zero this gives the differential equation above for the 3-function product rule. This can also be formally proved in a similar way to the 2 function proof we saw earlier. The rule can be extended to products with 4 or more functions, following the same pattern.

## See also

## Join the GraphicMaths Newletter

Sign up using this form to receive an email when new content is added:

## Popular tags

adjacency matrix alu and gate angle area argand diagram binary maths cartesian equation chain rule chord circle cofactor combinations complex polygon complex power complex root cosh cosine cosine rule cpu cube decagon demorgans law derivative determinant diagonal directrix dodecagon ellipse equilateral triangle eulers formula exponent exponential exterior angle first principles flip-flop focus gabriels horn gradient graph hendecagon heptagon hexagon horizontal hyperbola hyperbolic function infinity integration by substitution interior angle inverse hyperbolic function inverse matrix irregular polygon isosceles trapezium isosceles triangle kite koch curve l system locus maclaurin series major axis matrix matrix algebra minor axis nand gate newton raphson method nonagon nor gate normal not gate octagon or gate parabola parallelogram parametric equation pentagon perimeter permutations polar coordinates polynomial power product rule pythagoras proof quadrilateral radians radius rectangle regular polygon rhombus root set set-reset flip-flop sine sine rule sinh sloping lines solving equations solving triangles square standard curves star polygon straight line graphs surface of revolution symmetry tangent tanh transformations trapezium triangle turtle graphics vertical volume of revolution xnor gate xor gate